They finally did an experiment to prove out the broken window theory. For those of you who might not know what that is (although one of you explained it to me at some point), the propensity for vandalism increases the more disordered an area is. The example given is a broken window of a building. If one is broken people tend to feel ok about breaking others.
Anyway. It seems true (although I'm not sure how large their sample was, etc.).
It also seems a small leap to think the following:
What we are really thinking about here is perception. Whether this is subjective perception- this place looks untidy- or a subconscious disagreement with objective societal rules- if this space is being misused it's cool if I do it as well.
This seems to make sense. But it also seems to be absolutely bonkers. Think of the small (from a social experiment perspective) amount of people you know well. Now think of the how far on one side or the other some of them fall in the tidiness scale. Some are neat freaks. Some are absolute slobs.
Much of how you judge them on that scale relates not only to their perception of clean and dirty, but your perception as well. Mostly your perception. But that isn't really the point.
The point is, when people perceive something to be in disarray, they have a tendency to value that space in a different manner, one in which they break social conventions/laws.
So, the neater you are- the more likely you are to be a damn deviant, because you perceive spaces to be in disarray more than someone who tends to be a bit of a slob.
This seems crazy. Slobs are the psychos, right?
On a slightly related note this video I've included reminded me of this (for some reason).
Links:
The OG: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/198203/broken-windows
The New Hotness: http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12630201
I know I know, too much from Kottke.
1 comment:
shut up.
Post a Comment